Sunday, June 8, 2014


  It was brought to my attention that the subject matter in my posts are objectionable. I tried to walk a fine line, but the line seems a bit blurred. So in order to appeal to a bit wider group of CGI lovers I'll have to modify my basic story line a bit.
  We shall now be Rose Hills University. This leaves no doubts as to the ages of my girls. I never wished to offend anybody and I hope I haven't. I do like to explore non main stream sexual scenarios. I have shelved a small series I had just finished, until I can redo it, do to it's fine line subject matter.
  I have more to come with Kahlan's first nude public photo shoot.


  1. I assume it had to do with Wendy's age?

  2. Her age was legal, but looked young and her charactor profile was a bit too ambigious.

    1. You could add something to your disclaimer about all models are meant to depict characters of legal age.

      It's seems kinda silly, but I know in the United States atleast there's laws against artistic depictions people under the age of 18.

    2. Actually in the US, a Supreme court ruling says CG/renditions works are not child porn, but having said that nobody will touch it with a 10 foot pole. Someday in the future I don't know where this hobby, for now, will lead me and I don't want to make my website unuseable.